About your Search

20121201
20121231
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
, lack of a better term, triball rivalries or the u.s. cooperation creates resentment among another group. they want to develop their neighbors, but not lackees of the americans. there's insight into the impact hispanic candidate -- impact that history's had. they are used to conquerors coming and going so they create a relationship in how they hedge their bets. apart from the human tragedies, your heart breaks reading about someone who had a baby, spoke to his wife before he went on the mission, and then died in a helicopter crash. your heart breaks on the human realm reminding you of the cost. it reminds you the low gist tick -- logistical challenges. >> did it make you regret our approach in afghanistan? >> no. i think it reminds us of the challenges of it. at the end of theday, afghanistan is important and important for multiple reasons. we don't want a safe haven in afghanistan for people to come back and reconstitute the safe taifn. to have an unstable afghanistan where radical islamists are organized is a danger to pakistan and its nuclear capabilities. they are concerned about tha
savings should be used for that. yes, we know that, but the federal reserve and the u.s. and federal banks in some countries have it written black and white in their chargers that they need to consider jobs and economic growth. i am not saying we need to teach our legislation immediately. what i am saying is that we should all think about russia's economic development. our savings should work for the benefit of our country. but the national welfare fund is not investing in the economy at the moment. we have agreed that after the reserve fund exceeds 7% of gdp, we can send how of what is above the level into the russian economy, especially infrastructure projects. [applause] and now, i'd like to say a few words about the necessary adjustments to her earlier agreements. at the end of this year, the reserve fund and national welfare fund together will reach 9% of gdp. this means starting with 2013, after we create the necessary management structure, i suggest that some of the funds and the national welfare fund would start with 100 billion. some say should be even more, should be invested in
there and to use these funds for increased security at u.s. embassies and other overseas posts identified in the department's security review after the benghazi attack making additional funds available for this purpose is one of the recommendations of the accountable -- accountability review board chaired by ambassador pickerring and admiral mullen. this amendment is a permissive amendment. it is not a prescriptive amendment. it permits the transfer of funds between the diplomatic program and embassy security, construction and maintenance at which would otherwise be precluded due to percentage limitations on such transfers. according to c.b.o., the amendment has no outlay scoring impact. we all want to do -- we all want to do what we can to prevent another tragedy like what occurred in benghazi. the state department has done a review and these funds will be used to expedite construction of marine security guard posts overseas posts to, build secure embassies in beirut, lebanon and zimbabwe. there is nothing controversial about this amendment. these are existing funds. there is no new appr
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3